News / Blog

US Dairy Goes from Accidental Exporter to Internationalist
May 13, 2015

In late April Freshagenda’s directors were fortunate to attend the ADPI/ABI (American Dairy Products Institute/American Butter Institute) Conference in Chicago, writes Jo Bills.

 This major conference draws around 1000 delegates and is dubbed as the place “Where The Dairy Industry Does Business” – networking and deals dominate proceedings.

Conference sessions aren’t a high priority for many attendees – but a key-note session featuring some of the US dairy industry’s most senior and respected leaders drew a large crowd.

For us it provided some insights into the changing mindset of the US dairy sector towards the world market outside their borders and their transition to being “internationalist”.

The conference panel discussion on global trade featured leaders of three exporting cooperatives, a US-based international trader and a highly respected consultant in risk management and procurement.

Jim Wegner, the outgoing President and CEO of the Northwest Dairy Association (Darigold), effectively set out the likely future reality for the industry based on extrapolating trends in production and domestic consumption.

In 2014 exports accounted for 15% of US milk production, but projecting forward, Wegner’s analysis suggests exports will represent 23.5% of output by 2020 – a greater share than domestic fluid milk consumption which is expected to continue to decline.

Exporting will not be an optional extra for the US industry – it will be at the very core of the business.

In meeting that challenge, the discussion went to tackling some of the realities of being more international.

A lot of this centred on quality issues and farmer support arrangements which significantly hamper the industry in its export efforts.

Standards of identity for butter and SMP that are different from international norms, a pricing system that makes it difficult for exporters to commit to forward export orders, when the cost of their major input – milk – is based on domestic market trends, is constantly shifting, and subject to administrative rules that are out of step with the current and evolving situation.

Changing these settings will take enormous political will in a climate where the machinery of US government is highly dysfunctional.

It’s not all about obstacles; Mike McCully from the McCully Group highlighted the advantage the US has in an increasingly volatile trading environment in having a strong market culture that embraces risk management tools such as futures, options, swaps and forward contracts.

Some of the real gems came from Jay Waldvogel, who for a time saw action as COO at Fonterra, but is now a senior vice-president in Dairy Farmers of America.

He talked about the length and complexity of supply chains that mean that export returns will not grow in a straight line, external factors, ”the unpredictable” will have ongoing impact.

He talked about fundamentals around increasing demand based on long term demographic and economic trends that do not go away when prices cycle downwards.

It seems the US industry suffers the same emotional rollercoaster our own industry goes through when it seems the promise falls short of the reality and markets don’t continually climb.

The panel’s discussion on sustainability would also be familiar to many in our own industry – that the word means different things to different people; how it can and will be used as a non-tariff barrier; and that many farmers see moves toward increased sustainability as adding costs.

Waldvogel made the point that consumers everywhere are concerned about sustainability – “not just the nut jobs” but also that the US is a “well-behaved” industry that can use sustainability as a competitive advantage if the industry can think about it positively.

Perhaps the most interesting insights, given where our own industry discussion has been in recent weeks, were shared in response to a question on the use of the productivity tool rbST, and GMOs.

It was acknowledged that major competitors – NZ and EU – do not use either, and that customers have varying degrees of sensitivity.

However, there was a clear push by a number of US industry leaders to position these technologies as supportive of sustainability, and that fragmenting the supply chain through segregation is not that big a deal given that “milk is not milk” anymore.

That’s OK – it’s an opportunity to differentiate and create value.

Again Waldvogel’s view was that safe, efficiently-produced and affordable milk to feed everyone is important – “we can’t feed everyone on organics”.

The US dairy sector is going through a significant transition from exporter to a truly international industry. It is clear though that US involvement in global dairy trade will continue to grow.

While some of the challenges – largely focussed on farm support arrangements, ironically – position them well behind other exporting regions; other aspects of the US dairy sector – their scale, efficiency and embrace of tools that deal with volatility as well as technologies that underpin sustainability – will make them formidable competitors in the future.

By: Jo Bills
Source: Dairy News Australia


Spring 2018